From
the article “Enhancing the Social Welfares is the Government’s Duty” by the
chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation, he points out that the
term gross national happiness is the future indicator for determining a
country’s social-economic development. “According to Wikipedia the definition
of the gross
national happiness (GNH) was designed in
an attempt to define an indicator and concept that measures quality of life or social progress in more holistic and psychological terms than only the economic indicator
of gross domestic
product (GDP).” It includes a wide category such as education and
social welfares. Even though the things listed above are no doubt important,
the methods which to achieve it are still based on money. Just think if you do
not have enough money to feed yourself how could you come up with spare money
to develop and maintain things.
The challenge for the Taiwanese
government now is that the generally public does not trust them. There are
always disagreements to the government’s decisions. The public thinks that the government
is only doing things to benefit rich people while the other suffers. There are
even articles written saying that the Taiwanese government should take some
Western countries for model. Perhaps it is true that these countries had both
well-developed economy and social welfares. The reality, however, is that each
country has its own history and culture therefore will not be the same. These
countries had long stable economy while the Taiwan Economic Miracle only popped
out in the recent thirty years. Yet, when we are making a decision we could not
take everything into consideration, or there will be no choice made at all. Referring
to the characteristic of public opinion, it contains the risks of
inconsistency, complexity and variability. For ordinary citizens does not take
the whole nation into concern, they are simply replying what changes had been
done to them.
The decision maker, therefore,
becomes important. Take the Taiwan’s Ten Major Construction Projects for
example. Although the public opinions were against it at first but soon found
favor from it. There is question why the general public behaved this way,
because Taiwan was experiencing significant effects from both the 1973 oil
crisis and economy crisis at that stage. Many people strongly believed that the
government should focus on people first than to develop economy. There were
even radical words on newspapers saying that the constructions are built for
the riches only for the poor people will never afford to drive a car on the
highway.
Apparently, the project brought
up the economy as it was expected and even better. It took the whole nation
into prosperity and became the well-known term of Taiwan Economic Miracle.
Moreover, many people were out of poverty and even became successful in various
businesses. But just think what if the government did not insist on its project
and listen to what the public wants. Developing public welfares may be right
but how to get the essential-money are more important.
Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_national_happiness
http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/56/56-17.pdf
Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_national_happiness
http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/56/56-17.pdf
The speed of your speaking is appropriate, so that we can understand your idea very well. In addition, the logic of your standpoint is clear. The whole representation can show your confidence about your issue.
回覆刪除You points out your idea very well. I do agree that the government should take care of the economic first before paying too much attention on education, since everything include books, professors, need money. however, how can we find the perfect point between economic progress and education improvement? Since it is also clear that we should not focus only on economic. Education matters a lot to our society as well. So, my question is, how can we determine the appropriate line between developing economy and education?
回覆刪除I like that you use question in your presentation, this way you can emphasize your idea furthermore. And the examples you gave are those we can relate to, which is good for our understanding. I can tell that you're very familiar of what you're saying, so you're saying it very smoothly. However I think you can pause or slow down a bit, so that we can follow.
回覆刪除I think your example about the hightway is very impressive, but I still think that public opinion has its value, although it might change from time to time.
回覆刪除You sometimes would look down to the floor when you made a mistake or when your were thinking, this showed that you were a little nervous on stage. It's better for you to smile and look in front, which will show that your are more confident.
Your annotation is really clear .
回覆刪除I think you did a good job of making a constructive article to clever your standpoint. Even I don't have any sense about this issue, I can understand the points by your article.
Robert:
回覆刪除You develop your thesis with plenty of suppotive examples. Especially the example of Ten Major Construction I like the most: It is quite persuasive for us to examine the present condition Taiwan faces: Most of our polictiitians are selfish and near- sighted. They can foresee no futrue trend but only votes for now. The exploit of democracy is to blame for Taiwan economic deficit.
Your presentation is fluent and well-prepared. And I think your example of the Taiwan’s ten Major Construction Projects is really persuasive and strong than ECFA.
回覆刪除I can see that you are full of confidence when presenting your annotation. It is very good and impressive. And also I think your examples are supportive enough for your point.
回覆刪除When you presented your topic, I could feel that you're fully prepared and confident. You took Ten Major Construction Projects for example and that left me a deep impression. You really did a good job.
回覆刪除Your presentation was well-organized and clear. When you spoke, you were confident and clearly stated each points. The Ten Major Construction Projects you mentioned as one of the example was really impressive and made your presentation more powerful.
回覆刪除I like your point with government, and that is people don't trust government. And I totally agree with you that many Taiwanese ask government to follow developed countries but they don't consider that our history are not the same. But I think you can talk about about some example about social welfare's problem in Taiwan, since you have mentioned that there are some problems with government.
回覆刪除