2013年10月20日 星期日

Annotation 1 (Revised)

From the article “Enhancing the Social Welfares is the Government’s Duty” by the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation, he points out that the term gross national happiness is the future indicator for determining a country’s social-economic development. “According to Wikipedia the definition of the gross national happiness (GNH) was designed in an attempt to define an indicator and concept that measures quality of life or social progress in more holistic and psychological terms than only the economic indicator of gross domestic product (GDP).” It includes a wide category such as education and social welfares. Even though the things listed above are no doubt important, the methods which to achieve it are still based on money. Just think if you do not have enough money to feed yourself how could you come up with spare money to develop and maintain things.      
The challenge for the Taiwanese government now is that the generally public does not trust them. There are always disagreements to the government’s decisions. The public thinks that the government is only doing things to benefit rich people while the other suffers. There are even articles written saying that the Taiwanese government should take some Western countries for model. Perhaps it is true that these countries had both well-developed economy and social welfares. The reality, however, is that each country has its own history and culture therefore will not be the same. These countries had long stable economy while the Taiwan Economic Miracle only popped out in the recent thirty years. Yet, when we are making a decision we could not take everything into consideration, or there will be no choice made at all. Referring to the characteristic of public opinion, it contains the risks of inconsistency, complexity and variability. For ordinary citizens does not take the whole nation into concern, they are simply replying what changes had been done to them.
The decision maker, therefore, becomes important. Take the Taiwan’s Ten Major Construction Projects for example. Although the public opinions were against it at first but soon found favor from it. There is question why the general public behaved this way, because Taiwan was experiencing significant effects from both the 1973 oil crisis and economy crisis at that stage. Many people strongly believed that the government should focus on people first than to develop economy. There were even radical words on newspapers saying that the constructions are built for the riches only for the poor people will never afford to drive a car on the highway.

Apparently, the project brought up the economy as it was expected and even better. It took the whole nation into prosperity and became the well-known term of Taiwan Economic Miracle. Moreover, many people were out of poverty and even became successful in various businesses. But just think what if the government did not insist on its project and listen to what the public wants. Developing public welfares may be right but how to get the essential-money are more important. 

Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_national_happiness
              http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/56/56-17.pdf

11 則留言:

  1. The speed of your speaking is appropriate, so that we can understand your idea very well. In addition, the logic of your standpoint is clear. The whole representation can show your confidence about your issue.

    回覆刪除
  2. You points out your idea very well. I do agree that the government should take care of the economic first before paying too much attention on education, since everything include books, professors, need money. however, how can we find the perfect point between economic progress and education improvement? Since it is also clear that we should not focus only on economic. Education matters a lot to our society as well. So, my question is, how can we determine the appropriate line between developing economy and education?

    回覆刪除
  3. I like that you use question in your presentation, this way you can emphasize your idea furthermore. And the examples you gave are those we can relate to, which is good for our understanding. I can tell that you're very familiar of what you're saying, so you're saying it very smoothly. However I think you can pause or slow down a bit, so that we can follow.

    回覆刪除
  4. I think your example about the hightway is very impressive, but I still think that public opinion has its value, although it might change from time to time.
    You sometimes would look down to the floor when you made a mistake or when your were thinking, this showed that you were a little nervous on stage. It's better for you to smile and look in front, which will show that your are more confident.

    回覆刪除
  5. Your annotation is really clear .
    I think you did a good job of making a constructive article to clever your standpoint. Even I don't have any sense about this issue, I can understand the points by your article.

    回覆刪除
  6. Robert:
    You develop your thesis with plenty of suppotive examples. Especially the example of Ten Major Construction I like the most: It is quite persuasive for us to examine the present condition Taiwan faces: Most of our polictiitians are selfish and near- sighted. They can foresee no futrue trend but only votes for now. The exploit of democracy is to blame for Taiwan economic deficit.

    回覆刪除
  7. Your presentation is fluent and well-prepared. And I think your example of the Taiwan’s ten Major Construction Projects is really persuasive and strong than ECFA.

    回覆刪除
  8. I can see that you are full of confidence when presenting your annotation. It is very good and impressive. And also I think your examples are supportive enough for your point.

    回覆刪除
  9. When you presented your topic, I could feel that you're fully prepared and confident. You took Ten Major Construction Projects for example and that left me a deep impression. You really did a good job.

    回覆刪除
  10. Your presentation was well-organized and clear. When you spoke, you were confident and clearly stated each points. The Ten Major Construction Projects you mentioned as one of the example was really impressive and made your presentation more powerful.

    回覆刪除
  11. I like your point with government, and that is people don't trust government. And I totally agree with you that many Taiwanese ask government to follow developed countries but they don't consider that our history are not the same. But I think you can talk about about some example about social welfare's problem in Taiwan, since you have mentioned that there are some problems with government.

    回覆刪除