“Capital is dead labor, which,
vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more
labor it sucks.” The German economist Karl Marx has defined Capitalism as an
unfair system for people to live in. The worry of Karl Marx is that if our
society were divided into two classes; the middle class who owned capital,
factory and hired wage laborers; and workers, who were just common people that
owned nothing at all. The fear of this system is that if it continues to circulates the middle class will eventually gain more money and the workers still
working for them.
However, the original purpose of Capitalism
is to get the hard working people to gain what they desired. The concept of “As
you sow, so will you reap.” Even Karl Marx himself agreed on this work-gain
concept.
Many people questioned the
existence of Capitalism. Criticisms have long stigmatized it to corruption,
bribery and the method to oppress the poor. The truth, however, is that without
Capitalism there will be no competition at all, simply because everyone is
distributed with the same rewards. Therefore, there is no motive for people to
strive hard because no matter you are hard working or lazy you will eventually
be the same. Think for a moment that if everyone has a job then we do not have
the burden of taking care of the poor and everyone could be able to feed
themselves. As a result, we can conclude that the Capitalism itself is originally
with proper purpose, but it is moral corruption that brought it to failure.
Take Singapore for example, the
country had successfully transformed itself from a British colonial port city
into one of the world’s financial center. According to Dr Harold Siow Song Teng,
a Research Fellow and Administrative Manager at the Centre on Asia, he argues
in his book Government Policy and Critical Success Factors of Small Businesses
in Singapore that “one of the main economic players responsible for Singapore’s
economic success is its small and medium-sized enterprises or SMEs. Their
overall success has helped propel the country and its people forward. From
economic policies to politics, Singapore is a planned and regulated economy.
Singapore’s economic success story is actually the result of a form of
capitalism carefully calibrated and controlled by the government.” Now think
for a minute if it not because a person wants to gain more money and not
because a person is benefited with the amount of work he devoted, how could Singapore
be called the head of the four Asian dragons.
Moreover, he
continues to claim that “An important element or aspect of good critical
success factors (CSFs) emerges from the role being played by the government.
The existence of good government or public policies that are pro-business is
vital for the success of firms”. Singapore enforced strict laws that punishes
whoever deviate the right path toward righteous. For example, if there happened
to be any forms of bribery or moral corruption severe punishments such as life
imprisonment would be enforced.
In the end, the statistics had
proved Singapore to be the world’s financial center. It is simply due to the severe
laws that supervised the government’s performance. Moral corruption is a
dangerous thing that leads to destructions. However, if we found ways to
overcome it the result will be beneficial.
References:
Harold Siow Song Teng “Government Policy and
Critical Success Factors of Small Businesses in Singapore” Nov 2011 http://www.c-s-p.org/flyers/Government-Policy-and-Critical-Success-Factors-of-Small-Businesses-in-Singapore1-4438-3352-5.htm
The statement in your annotation is very clear and convincing.
回覆刪除I want to give you some grammar suggestions.
In the third paragraph, the third line: there is no motive....-> you should use the noun "motivation" instead of its adjective.
In the forth paragraph, the fifth sentence: Their overall success has helped propel the country...-> you should add the prep. "to" between helped and propel.
I have seen your revised, and you can notice that the sentence: There are many kind of ....-> it should be "many kinds of"
and this one:These include temptation; laziness and power pursue which will destroy a country’s economy structure if it involved.---> I think "it is involved" or " it involves" will be better, I don't know what meaning of "involve" you want to use in this sentence, but because you use present tense before, the past tense of involve here could be confusing.
I think Singapore is a good example and it do seems fair and wealthy in that country.
回覆刪除But can you prove that Singapore government is really that "untouchable"? And do you think that Singapore government's justice and fairness has anything to do with our country? In Taiwan our government and our law might not be as strict the ones in Singapore, so when we are right now having problems dealing with the fairness in our own country, and also we lack the ability to be as clean as the Singapore government, at this time we should not look up to them to find answers, we have to take care of our own problem right here and right now. And the problem is, we have corruption in our govern system.