2013年12月2日 星期一

“As you sow, so will you reap.” Capitalism is Actually the fairest

“Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.” The German economist Karl Marx has defined Capitalism as an unfair system for people to live in. The worry of Karl Marx is that if our society were divided into two classes; the middle class who owned capital, factory and hired wage laborers; and workers, who were just common people that owned nothing at all. The fear of this system is that if it continues to circulates the middle class will eventually gain more money and the workers still working for them.
However, the original purpose of Capitalism is to get the hard working people to gain what they desired. The concept of “As you sow, so will you reap.” Even Karl Marx himself agreed on this work-gain concept.      
Many people questioned the existence of Capitalism. Criticisms have long stigmatized it to corruption, bribery and the method to oppress the poor. The truth, however, is that without Capitalism there will be no competition at all, simply because everyone is distributed with the same rewards. Therefore, there is no motive for people to strive hard because no matter you are hard working or lazy you will eventually be the same. Think for a moment that if everyone has a job then we do not have the burden of taking care of the poor and everyone could be able to feed themselves. As a result, we can conclude that the Capitalism itself is originally with proper purpose, but it is moral corruption that brought it to failure.
Take Singapore for example, the country had successfully transformed itself from a British colonial port city into one of the world’s financial center. According to Dr Harold Siow Song Teng, a Research Fellow and Administrative Manager at the Centre on Asia, he argues in his book Government Policy and Critical Success Factors of Small Businesses in Singapore that “one of the main economic players responsible for Singapore’s economic success is its small and medium-sized enterprises or SMEs. Their overall success has helped propel the country and its people forward. From economic policies to politics, Singapore is a planned and regulated economy. Singapore’s economic success story is actually the result of a form of capitalism carefully calibrated and controlled by the government.” Now think for a minute if it not because a person wants to gain more money and not because a person is benefited with the amount of work he devoted, how could Singapore be called the head of the four Asian dragons.  
Moreover, he continues to claim that “An important element or aspect of good critical success factors (CSFs) emerges from the role being played by the government. The existence of good government or public policies that are pro-business is vital for the success of firms”. Singapore enforced strict laws that punishes whoever deviate the right path toward righteous. For example, if there happened to be any forms of bribery or moral corruption severe punishments such as life imprisonment would be enforced.
In the end, the statistics had proved Singapore to be the world’s financial center. It is simply due to the severe laws that supervised the government’s performance. Moral corruption is a dangerous thing that leads to destructions. However, if we found ways to overcome it the result will be beneficial.   
        
References:
Harold Siow Song Teng “Government Policy and Critical Success Factors of Small Businesses in Singapore” Nov 2011      http://www.c-s-p.org/flyers/Government-Policy-and-Critical-Success-Factors-of-Small-Businesses-in-Singapore1-4438-3352-5.htm

2 則留言:

  1. The statement in your annotation is very clear and convincing.
    I want to give you some grammar suggestions.
    In the third paragraph, the third line: there is no motive....-> you should use the noun "motivation" instead of its adjective.
    In the forth paragraph, the fifth sentence: Their overall success has helped propel the country...-> you should add the prep. "to" between helped and propel.

    I have seen your revised, and you can notice that the sentence: There are many kind of ....-> it should be "many kinds of"
    and this one:These include temptation; laziness and power pursue which will destroy a country’s economy structure if it involved.---> I think "it is involved" or " it involves" will be better, I don't know what meaning of "involve" you want to use in this sentence, but because you use present tense before, the past tense of involve here could be confusing.

    回覆刪除
  2. I think Singapore is a good example and it do seems fair and wealthy in that country.
    But can you prove that Singapore government is really that "untouchable"? And do you think that Singapore government's justice and fairness has anything to do with our country? In Taiwan our government and our law might not be as strict the ones in Singapore, so when we are right now having problems dealing with the fairness in our own country, and also we lack the ability to be as clean as the Singapore government, at this time we should not look up to them to find answers, we have to take care of our own problem right here and right now. And the problem is, we have corruption in our govern system.

    回覆刪除